AMD Launch 45nm Chips
It also has a forthcoming range of desktop processors built on 45nm technology codenamed "Deneb". Both of these ranges are constructed using a process called "immersion lithography". AMD claim that this fabrication technique will lead to ‘dramatic performance and performance-per-watt gains.’ The new Opterons will have an increased clock speed due to this fabrication process; rising from 2.3 GHz with the current Barcelona-cored Opterons, to 2.7 GHz with the Shanghai-cored chips. The current Phenom range, which run at up to 2.6GHz, may also benefit from this upward-clocking in their next incarnation. The new Shanghai-cores also benefit from increased cache-size, as well as from HyperTransport 3.0, which increases bandwidth considerably. Let’s hope they vastly outperform the Intel competition as well as the previous/current Phenom CPUs, or AMD is going to have a hard time on its hands and will probably end up cutting retail prices to offer a cheaper though lesser alternative to the Intel developments.
AMD also plan to introduce a new six-cored range of chips called "Istanbul" sometime next year (2009). As for Deneb; AMD will probably be launching them before the end of 2008. The Question is can AMD ever get ahead of Intel again? Can they even catch up; and if so is this their chance? What’s your opinion?
|
It May Be Fall But Apple Continues Growing in the US
|
Despite a strong wind from the NASDAQ with the potential to dislodge Apple and send it tumbling as an economic drop-out; the company has had its own windfall in the States recently according to figures released by US market watcher NPD: The figures indicate that Apple made an impressive 20% of all retail notebook computer sales during July and August of this year, 2008. The MacBook range of laptops appear to have gone down well with parents buying for their kids for the new school year, as well as with students. I perceive the dollar-signs lighting up so bright in the eyes of Jobsweh; god of all things Apple, that they nearly cause a fire as he curls his talons around his increasing capital assets:- The 20% figure is for stock turnover. The revenue percentage of market share is 35%: Whoever suggested that Jobsweh had priced himself out of the market? Of course, as I mentioned in another article, the MacBook line is due to be refreshed about now or in the very near future - Yet even just clearing the old stock has set the cash-registers ringing merrily across America. The “anti-Vista lobby”; IOW a large percentage of (ex-)Windows users, must have helped account for the unexpected fortune of the company - switching from Windows notebooks now mainly only available pre-installed with Vista, to MacBooks with OSX installed. Despite the relatively high-costs involved it seems the American public on the whole feel that it’s a price worth paying.
Can this boom continue or is it merely a lucky blip? Despite the economic misfortune that now bites the world economy, it appears that Apple have had such an effective marketing campaign that consumers will still buy MacBooks despite the extra price tag and the cheaper Linux-bearing alternatives. It would be wise for Apple to drop their profit-margin somewhat on the upcoming ranges though, as competition is still rife and economic future trends would appear to favour lower-cost devices. If the price of the new lines are right then Apple have the chance to make another massive windfall, rather than breaking where their growth is stemmed, and dropping from the money-tree to become fodder for the foragers and scavengers of recession. Do you think Steve Jobs (Jobsweh) can resist overpricing his wares?
|
Apple At Last Improve Their Act
|
After my continuing opposition to Apple’s products; in particular the iPhone; you’ll probably be surprised to hear that I’m glad that Apple have at last brought out a platform-update in the form of iPhone 2.1.
Apple have not only fixed most of the bugs that came with 2.0 but also have added a number of features. I’m not an Apple user myself; so I’ll not go into all the tech details here; rather I’ll link you to this site for more on that. But despite this all my previous commentaries still stand with regard to Apple. If you haven’t seen my previous commentaries in this blog you can find them by using the search facility, by clicking on “Apple” in the tag cloud, or through Google/Yahoo by inputting kkomp.com Apple into the search bar. Apple are becoming the image of Microsoft in my opinion: They produce buggy unfinished software in their rush to get the product onto the market; after which they fix the bugs with an upgrade - Exactly what M$ did with Vista. (My blog stats show that, despite Windows being the most-used operating system(s); the number of XP users who visit this blog is almost seven times the number of Vista users. (After Vista comes Linux in third place, followed by Mac OSX, and then Windows 98.))
Back in June 2008 I commented in a scoop that Apple had rushed the 2,0 platform through in order to get out ahead of the LG Viewty; which they saw as the major competition at the time. Well that tactic; while being more Microsofty than anything other than Microsoft themselves, worked; and the Viewty didn’t make it as major competition to the iPhone. It wasn’t only that though; the fact is that the Viewty is an excellent camera-phone; and in that respect alone is many times better than the iPhone. However what the Viewty doesn’t have is the ability to run Apps, and neither does it have an App store. So in the light of the above; was it worth the rush? Was it worth it for Apple to produce a buggy product ahead of time just to beat a partially-competitive product from a rival to market? Maybe; maybe not: But the proof of the pudding is in the eating - Jobsweh (Steve Jobs) gambled on it and it worked. I can’t knock it. I wouldn’t have done that myself - But that’s probably why Steve Jobs is CEO of Apple and I’m a blogger. No more need be said on that. Apple have seemingly at last saved face: Good on them; kudos to them. It’s going to boost the Apple image, and no doubt sales figures will be affected in some positive way. BUT why follow the Microsoft route? Because it works? It does; but there must be a better way; because it’ll end in being tarred with the Microsofty-brush; if that hasn’t started to happen already. What do you think this move will bring for Apple? Do you agree that Apple are going the Microsofty route? How would you run Apple if you were Steve Jobs? Feel free to leave a comment. |
Comments
Rotten Apple
Latest reports appear to indicate that Apple aren’t quite as bad as it seems; in fact it might appear at first sight that they had a windfall. That’s not exactly the case though: Despite news of their taking top customer-satisfaction honours among personal computer manufacturers, as released on Tuesday of this week, there are two things you should note before assuming that Apple are the tops and that this blog is heavily biased against them: Firstly nobody even thought to ask Kustom Komputa if they even wanted to be included in this award; probably because they knew Kustom Komputa would trounce Apple into second place. On a more serious note, though, the index measures results only for the three-month period ended in June - Before the crap began to hit the fan for Apple, starting with the release of the iPhone. Also on Tuesday; Apple admitted that a software update for their much troubled iPhone only partly fixes the connection problems it has had in connecting to 3G networks: In other words; honestly this time: “FAIL: We scratched again.” It has been reported that it isn’t only Apple’s buggy software that’s to blame: There have been reports that the Infineon Technologies 3G chipsets used in the iPhone are faulty. That could mean that no matter how good the software, the hardware issue might cause the problem to never totally go away. |
|
|
|
|
|
It has been reported that it isn’t only Apple’s buggy software that’s to blame: There have been reports that the Infineon Technologies 3G chipsets used in the iPhone are faulty. That could mean that no matter how good the software, the hardware issue might cause the problem to never totally go away. The crap certainly has been hitting the fan lately for Apple; and maybe rightly so too: It seems that Steve Jobs has always been a bit of a dreamer; As reported here on kkomp.com; Apple were recently forced to extend the free trial of MobileMe in a face-saving operation. “We have already made many improvements to MobileMe, but we still have many more to make.” Said Apple. To me that sounds like: “We did it again by releasing a service well ahead of schedule in order to market before the competition: It wasn’t actually ready to be released; but we did so out of a case of having to. We hope we can eventually get it to work.” If they don’t it’ll end up costing them a few dollars more; which could incur the wrath of Jobsweh! In the same email Apple stated “We know that MobileMe’s launch has not been our finest hour.” ROFLMAO - You’re telling me! What exactly has been Apple’s finest hour during the past two months? Steve Jobs seems to think he’s Apple’s answer to Bill Gates of late. The question is; is Jobsweh, the god with the bottomless pockets, fit to run Apple any longer? Should someone more competent and less greedy take over? |
|
Fire Your Computer Technician!A computer technician spills the beans and makes available the knowledge he has charged clients hundreds in service fees for. |
One Bad Apple Spoils the Whole DNS
On August 1, 2008 Apple Inc. issued patches for 17 vulnerabilities in Mac OS X, including one meant to fix a critical bug in the DNSThe DNS patch doesn’t seem to be very effective though; according to Andrew Storms, director of security operations at nCircle Network Security Inc. “The difficult news this morning is that we thought we were getting a patch, but we haven’t gotten anything”
|
||
|
|
||
|
Last week after the technical details of the DNS vulnerability were revealed exploit code appeared; this week attacks began against unpatched servers. Apple’s boob, a patch that doesn’t patch, isn’t going to stop further attacks. Tests revealed that systems running Mac OS X weren’t randomising ports as they should have been doing if the supposed fix was working.
|
||
|
|
||
|
One would have thought that after Apples recent history of poor performances; such as releasing a buggy firmware platform early in order to beat the competition to market, http://kkomp.com/archives/214 and producing an auto-disintegrating case for the iPhone itself, http://kkomp.com/archives/664 they’d have made a special determined effort to get things precise and spot-on from that point. Apparently not though: It appears that Apple’s catalogue of disaster is continuing to be revealed. Perhaps Steve Jobs should make way for a better candidate - But if Microsoft is anything to go by then the same power-struggle will happen with Apple too. |
||
|
||
|
XoftSpySE Anti-Spyware: As a user of XoftSpySE myself I can thoroughly recommend it to anyone seeking a thorough defence against spyware.To discover more and get a FREE scan Click Here! |
Are Intel Really the Tops?
| The pro-Intel lobby is becoming fairly massive: With Intel most likely paying backhanders to media publishers to promote their products at basically any cost, you’ll see adverts for Intel processors everywhere. There are many reviews of the huge variety of different Intel products in many accredited media outlets, such as constructor magazines and commercial guide publications, online and on paper as sold in High Street newsagents. You see very few reviews of AMD products though; and most if not all that I have managed to find hidden amongst the reams and pages of Intel-glorifying glossy advertising pages are fairly demeaning and give AMD much lower ratings than their Intel rivals. I’m trying not to get all technical in this article; so without explaining everything in vast technical detail I’m going to attempt to continue and write a post than can be understood by most people with a basic understanding of the insides of a computer. I want to communicate with my readers rather than blind them with science. I want to write an article based on the title rather than a textbook based upon trying to prove how clever or otherwise I am: I’ll leave the techno-rants to the egotists for now. |
  |
| Product Superiority?A lot of people would say that Intel processors are superior and more functional compared to AMD’s offerings, also that they are faster and more efficient: My reply to that is yes and no: Intel’s recent processors are definitely much better for overclocking than AMD’s; and quite vastly so - Which is fine if you have enough money to produce a super-douper machine worthy of running at such a pace with enhanced multi-SLI graphics, latest motherboard, etc, including case mod and even gold-plated start button if you like. Also if you’re prepared for a limited processor lifetime because you’re running the CPU faster than it was ever designed to go.AMD’s CPUs are also less adaptable due to their having more circuit components actually built into the processor itself rather than being deployed on the motherboard in updated form with each motherboard revision or different model. AMD’s processors work like “x” and you know that they’re always going to work like “x”: Intel’s are more flexible.In my case I usually build low-to-middle-end computers for the average user and/or for an office, and I find AMD’s chips to be perfectly satisfactory for that purpose. If I were trying to equal the record for the fastest and best PC ever designed I would definitely go for an Intel CPU for its speed and overclockability. Saying that Intel products are superior to AMD products is to my mind like saying duck eggs are superior to goose eggs: Eggs is eggs; and each has its preferred usages.
|
 |
| A Brief History of CompetitionBack in time a few years to 2004 and AMD were market leaders with their single-cored Athlon 64: (One of which I have working away happily in an Exel computer in the office.) The first proper 64-bit capable processor, which blew away anything that Intel had to offer at the time. Then came the Athlon 64×2 dual-cored 64-bit capable processor from AMD; which was well developed using AMD’s developing technologies to provide a good and efficient internal architecture on a single silicon wafer. At or around the same time Intel brought their own 64-bit-capable dual-cored processor putting them on a par with AMD. It turned out that the Intel offering was more overclockable than AMD’s equivalent; therefore the power-users and super-geeks started using Intel processors along with water-cooling. AMD were at the same time developing the Phenom series of quad and triple-core processors; but at that point the game became very cut-throat when Intel “cheated” in bringing out a quad-core by stapling two dual-cored wafers together before AMD had had a chance to fully develop their Phenom architecture which had been beset by a situation caused by a bug in the hardware. Both AMD and Intel have brought out 65nm technologies which reduce the power consumption and increase the individual transistor’s switching times considerably. It turns out that Intel have been working on 45nm technology for over 11 years and have perfected it to the point that the first CPUs based on this further miniaturisation are starting to appear …And so for at least the last year or so Intel has been recognised as market leader simply because its products are far more overclockable than AMD’s and therefore are endorsed by the geeks. – Any product endorsed by geeks tends to get rated highly. Now to add to that they will gain an endorsement from the green environmentalist faction for their 45nm and smaller technology’s lower power consumption: They’ve completely and utterly leapfrogged AMD with regard to market domination. |
 |
| The Big Question Is… Are the geeks being led blindly by market forces? Reality and actual statistics would appear to indicate that there’s no massive performance gap between the respective competitors’ products after all; despite all the bad press AMD may have been getting. OK so company performance, a separate issue to company product, may well be vastly superior in the case of Intel, As we saw with Apple, however, in an earlier post, ( http://kkomp.com/archives/214 ) it’s not necessarily always product superiority that sells product.Addendum:
Another thing is that Intel will soon be facing antitrust charges for allegedly using unlawful methods to keep ahead of AMD in the marketplace. European regulators could bring the charges forward according to the Wall Street Journal. “We are continuing to cooperate and really don’t know what the commission will do,” Intel spokesman Chuck Mulloytold the Journal. “We believe we operate within the law.” Intel was accused by the Europen Comission of illegal practices last year; selling chips below cost and offering huge rebates to customers. The company is also facing a formal investigation by the US Federal Trade Commission. Intel has already been fined over £12 million by the Korean Fair Trade Commission. Intel are set to appeal; but all this litigation can’t be all that good for the chipmaker.
|
Get Rich Quick
|
If you were attracted to this post because you thought you’d find a scheme to make you an instant millionaire/ss overnight you’re out of luck: There is no such scheme; not from kkomp.com, nor from anywhere else. There are many schemes that claim to be such; but that’s utter piffle to get you and a few thousand others to part with your money so that the person who runs the scheme can vanish with it eventually: Yes it’s a one-person get-rich-quick scheme; and that one person aint you. So why call this post “Get Rich Quick”? Is it a plan to attack Rich Menga of PC Mech? Is it a conspiracy to commit the ultimate cyber-crime? What is the point? Options The point is that you have 2 main “get-rich” options: The slowest of those being to work for someone else for less than 1% of their nett income whilst giving your complete mind, body, and soul to them for up to 8 hours or maybe more, at least 5 days a week, ad infinitum - aka “Get a job.”. How slow is that as a “get-rich” option? Very slow; and incredibly so: In fact it’ll most likely never happen. It pays the bills for as long as it lasts, yes. It’ll keep you ticking over, maybe it’ll even get you the occasional luxury, possibly you might even manage to save some of it up, but you’ll never get rich doing it: Your employer or your employer’s boss probably might well do so though; at least to a greater extent than you ever will. That’s a complete non-starter then - But I did say there was another option. No there isn’t a guarantee with it - There’s not even a guarantee that you’ll be better off than with the first option initially; but if you’re prepared to stick at it in a positive and self-motivated way then the sky’s the limit - Allow me to restate that in a different light: You’re the limit: If you put only a little in you’ll get even less out of it - But if you put a lot in you’ll probably get even more out of it. (Notice I did say “probably”: There is no guarantee as I said; and there are losers - There have to be losers for there to be winners: Fact of life; yin and yang, swings and roundabouts, call it what you will, whatever, but the thing is with this method you have to be in it to win it.) What am I on about? Self-employment. No Streets Paved With Gold Here So all self-employed people are rich? No; but show me an employed person who is rich. Yes they might well be comfortably off and living well as long as they do their job and make someone else rich, but could they stop what they’re doing and stay that way? Can they decide when and for how long they take a break from the job? In short no - So they’re under the boss’ thumb and they’ll have problems if they don’t keep working to the boss’ dictates or they lose their comfortable salary: They’re not rich then. What benefits will self-employment bring? You want the honest answer to that? Good; because that’s what you’re going to get, and I’m not going to give you any bull: If you’re totally serious about the self-employed venture and are wanting to go for it in a big way then the initial benefits are nothing, nil, zero, zilch, sweet FA: There aren’t any. In fact at first the opposite will be the effect: More going out than coming in, expenses appearing from places you maybe didn’t even know existed, and all the possible demotivating influences imaginable in your face. You’ll be seemingly investing all your time and money and reaping no result whatsoever other than losses at first: that’s the truth and that’s the major make-or-break time - Probably the biggest drain on your resources that you’ll ever experience; and pretty it is not. If you’re going to go under then that’s when it’s most likely to occur. If you’re serious about the venture then you’ll want to put all your resources into it; so before doing so you need to know that you have sufficient resources to weather the storm that you’re about to create for yourself. You’ll need: 1) Investment capital. This can be generated by either making (a) part-time, “on-the-side” venture(s) previous to going for the “big-one”; by working for someone else whilst living frugally, and saving every available penny over a period of time; by building up your assets from nothing gradually by investment and/or by partial enterprise over time, or by any combination of those. 2) Self-motivation, positive attitude, and determination. You’re lacking on any or all of these? Stay with the smaller side of enterprise for now in that case. In the meantime build up these personal qualities to a point where you’re confident that you can and you know you can. Self-doubt and a lack of motivation will kill your efforts off from the start otherwise. Believe in yourself: To do so you must grow self-confidence, you must like yourself, you must become your own best-friend: You must believe totally in yourself and in your own abilities. Don’t bullshit yourself though: If you don’t have the necessary abilities first then you need to develop them before you go ahead and make an investment in them; otherwise you’d do far better giving your hard-earned investment capital to a charity. 3) A plan. I once needed an audio amplifier in a hurry when I was at college; so I switched on my soldering iron and I built one. It worked and it got me out of a tight spot. In doing so I wasted a large number of resources, mainly physical components, and I dismantled it afterwards; as it was, to be honest, an abomination to my eyes: Had I tried to get anyone else to buy it I’d have wasted my time - I probably couldn’t have even paid someone else to take it off me. Why? Am I that awful a technician? Not at all: The thing was I had no plans to build it to; and yes it worked for what I needed it to do right then and there, but other than that it was virtually useless. I later built a very similar amplifier to a plan as part of my City and Guilds exams and it helped me to pass them. The moral of this story: No plans = no good. Draw up your business plans from day one and adjust them with the passage of time to accommodate current trends. 4) Goals. Especially good if your business is a soccer team, but realistically you must sit down and contemplate exactly what it is that you want to achieve. Example: Your ultimate goal is a million dollars/pounds. Your current status is what you have now. Define every stage between now and your ultimate goal and write it down in proposed chronological order. Having done that set yourself realistic targets of achievement leading up to and including the ultimate goal. Be positive, stick to the schedule, make sure you do it exactly as planned: Write your goals down: eg. I will make another $4000 by next Monday by such-and-such a method - Note the “I will” and make sure you do; by the deadline, to the plan with any necessary minor adjustments: Setting a goal involves knowing what you wish to achieve and when you wish to achieve it - Anything less just doesn’t work: “I will make another $4000″ without setting a deadline means you’ll still be making it for the rest of your life. It’s hard, it’s tough, it’s mean, it’s a lifetime’s work, and it doesn’t always either go as you planned or work as well as you’d hoped, and sometimes both. At least it does (normally) make some kind of progress, towards not only enriching the individual’s character and resolve, but also enhancing one’s personal financial position, with varying results from case to case - Which is a hell of a lot further than a 9 to 5 job can ever get anyone. And Finally… Back to the title - Get Rich Quick: You might get temporarily wealthy quickly if you’re running a get-rich-quick scheme and you happen to attract enough gullible individuals. Let’s just hope you can vanish into exile even faster when the authorities pick up your scent. Other than that you can’t: As we’ve seen though, you can probably get somewhere or you can definitely get nowhere,depending upon which option you choose. Strangely most people would rather choose the latter; which is good for those who choose the former as it does reduce the level of competition to some extent, making it a bit easier to be a winner because there are people who are determined to lose, as well as those who don’t make it anyway try as they might. Me? I haven’t made it yet; and I’m seemingly making steady, though not as fast as I’d like to, progress forwards… But I’m still alive so I’m still getting there. Can I make it? Yes. Will I make it? If I can - And if I can then what’s stopping you? Like me you were hopefully born with 2 arms, 2 legs, and 24 hours in each day. If so then you were born with everything I was born with: We started from the same starting line - In fact you were born with everything Bill Gates was born with too: Use it wisely.
To Bill Gates…Born like most of us with 2 arms, 2 legs, and 24 hours in each day…Who made it. ©KKomp 2008
|
What a Difference a Day Makes (Condensed)
Twenty-four little hours - With the sun and the showers, where there used to be rain.
OK it’s an old song and you probably know the lyrics. The song is about how someone else has changed her life for the better: It’s Looove; and that great “new love” feeling has set her heart on fire. She’s walking on cloud nine and flying through the universe on a breeze…
Of course we all actually realise that that sort of thing is only temporary…At least I hope we all do: While it’s a great feeling and good for overall emotional and physical health, it only lasts as long as it lasts; then it’s gone, and reality bites again: The bills continue to come in, the problems that were there before are still there, and have got worse through neglect - And now freedom’s limited too: There’s someone else in her life, and there is life outside the bedroom:-
What has it all accomplished? The answer is, on average, sweet Fanny Adams at the end of the day: that’s not to say that being in love is bad for anyone, but a beter song IMO would be “Sisters Are Doing it For Themselves” - Without the unintentional double entendre’ it is a fact that what someone else does for one is, in most cases, only temporary; whereas when one accomplishes acheivments on their own behalf, one has not only a feeling of satisfaction and accomplishment, but also one can make the accomplishment last a lifetime and build upon that/those accomplishment/s with further accomplishments. When one has stacked accomplishment upon accomplishment upon accomplishment one has a wall: The Wall of Success, and nobody can demolish it fully no matter how hard they try. It becomes one’s personal sheild against the negativities of life.
This is true not only in a physical sense: In a personal psychological sense the same holds true; but the psychological is the forerunner of the physical: When one has a wall of Positive Mental Attitude (’Good ol’ PMA!) built from blocks of positivity, confidence, happiness, and productive efficient proactive thinking; one then has what it takes to screen out the crap that life pushes at everyone - No the crap doesn’t bounce off or take evasive action: The crap hits as hard as ever; but since the wall of PMA is more positive than the crap is negative then the wall dissolves the crap because the positive personality of the person in question; and let’s hope that person is you, deals with it and neutralises it.
What happens when a mind full of positivity and ingenuity, of creativity and abundant goodness communicates with or works with anything? The positivity and the goodness comes out too and dissolves crap; making the objects or situations it’s working with cleaner, brighter, and more positive; more desirable. A mind full of crap, on the other hand, has the opposite effect. If the wall of PMA isn’t there the crap gets in unchallenged. There is a saying that is very true, but for a different reason than originally intended: “Shit sticks” - If crap gets into one’s mind, life, being, it’ll stay there and it’s difficult to clean it out afterward; so powerful is the negative. Negativity can be empowered very easily: Positivity also but only by means of PMA. Negativity appears to be the default pattern - Positivity takes that little bit of extra effort.
Once one’s thinking pattern and one’s entire world view are positive then one has inner contentment: That is the first step by means of which one can start to self-motivatedly build the wall of acheivement. Nobody’s going to do it for you mind: Even if they try it’ll only be temporary. As soon as they take a break or turn their back the wall comes tumbling down and the crap sees a line of attack and bam! The only person who can make ‘you’ a success is you by means of your own acheivement; and that’ll only happen through a combination of, not just all aspects of PMA, but also determination, motivation, self-discipline, persistance, and continuity.
The ladder of success has many rungs; and surprisingly most of those rungs are made of failure: Every step of failure is a positive step of experience, and is a step closer to success. That can be paraphrased as “If at first you don’t succeed; try, try again”; remembering of course that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing repeatedly in exactly the same way and expecting different results”. Therefore “If at first you don’t succeed; try, try again using a different method to acheive the same ends. I cite the example of Thomas Alva Edison, a 19th century American inventor, who, along with a couple of associates set out on a quest to bring light to everyone - Literally: Between 1850 and 1892, (Yes that is 42 years: Your calculation was correct.) he, Joseph Swan, Charles Brush, and others, developed, by trying and testing many methods, sometimes in competition and sometimes in collaberation with one another, the electric light bulb. I can just imagine that failure must have followed failure after failure in the case of each of them; but by sheer persistance and determination they succeeded, and their invention is still in use worldwide to a certain extent at the time of writing this article some 116 years after the initial project’s completion. See http://www.ideafinder.com/history/inventions/lightbulb.htm
Maybe you won’t be remembered in 116 years time, and maybe you won’t invent anything as major as Edison and Co did: Then again perhaps you will; but not if you give up and allow the crap in.
That’s all: Lecture over. What are you waiting for? Get out there; do it, and win! Start building your internal wall of PMA at the very least, and as you become stronger as a person and gain in self-confidence you might like to try your hand at laying a few physical blocks of success as foundations for the forthcoming Wall of Acheivement? Set its completion as your goal, divide up the ensuing process into sub-goals, make a chart and plot your progress why not? - Only the losers will laugh at you; and at the end of the day they’ll still be losers so who cares? Today could be your lucky day; and what a difference a day would make then eh?!
Are you still here? -Well I suppose you deserve a break after reading all this lot: Treat yourself to a coffee or whatever you prefer, and pretend it’s on me. Thanks for reading; now make something out of it that you can use to further yourself.
©KKomp 2008
Comments
Wall RSS Feed
