Are the secret Royal Codes now in the Public Domain? What other secrets accompany them?

On Thursday 18th December 2008, The Daily Telegraph reported that a laptop belonging to Sarah Ferguson, the Duchess of York, had been stolen when A thief broke into a photographic studio in Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, in England.

One of Fergie’s aides had taken the computer there in order to have private snaps of the Duchess, Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie, and her former husband Prince Andrew downloaded and archived.

They have very little, if any, chance of being published in a British newspaper, unless the editor is willing to be interrogated and probably charged by police. The thing is that there was almost definitely other data on the laptop’s hard-drive that was of a more sensitive nature: Passwords, address-book, secret royal codes? Would some mad identity thief attempt to pass herself off as Sarah Ferguson? It is a possibility.

Let’s hope that the Royals encrypt their data. Do they though? The UK Government don’t; or at least they didn’t: ‘Remember all the hoo-hah over the last couple of years when sensitive unencrypted records on disks were "lost" in the post, when ministers left laptops with unencrypted disks on the train, and when drives with unencrypted sensitive data were sold on eBay? The UK Royal Family will probably have to change all their passwords and security codes, if they haven’t already done so.

Whether or not the thief was an opportunist who stole the laptop to sell for drugs or similar; the criminals who end up with the machine in all probability are going to be trying every effort they can muster to get at the data on the hard-drive.

While the Duchess has had personal details disclosed in the past without her permission; could this lead to an expose’? Can you imagine headlines such as:-

"Laptop Thief Exposes Diana Death Royal Conspiracy" ?

Everything has both a negative and a positive side at the end of the day; although maybe not for the Royals if this were the case. – However such an occurrence is unlikely.

It does make one wonder, though, about what secrets are contained inside the laptops of the stars and the like.

If Madonna or some such celebrity were travelling on a train in the same carriage as you, and she left her laptop on the table when she got out; what would you do? Be honest now; and do tell.

In the UK; VAT will drop from 17.5% to 15% from Monday. The cut in VAT is one of Chancellor Alistair Darling’s tactics to encourage UK consumers to start spending again.

I think it’s a joke, and that the UK government have given too little away to make any real difference. Why so little? Because the UK Government, just like UK businesses; are greedy, and they don’t want to impact a high-income source too much.

Had they dropped it to 10%, or even 12 1/2%, that would have made a difference; but the proposed miniscule reduction will have negligible if any effect.

(Don’t forget; we’ll be paying for this eventually with a 20% VAT rate: I give this particular prediction a 4/5 chance of becoming a reality within the next 5 years.

The next government; if it’s Labour, will realise that there just isn’t enough revenue from GDP, despite a partial recovery, to balance the books against the massive debt built up when today’s Labour government threw money at the recession in the hope that it would go away before the available coffers ran out. (It won’t, but the excessive spending will help to cushion the depression.) Up will go Income Tax in the higher rates band for people earning £150,000+, and National Insurance Contributions, by up to 2%: But the prominent rise will be in VAT; which will then be raised from the reset figure of 17.5% to 20%. That will leave some people up to 5.5% worse off in order to pay for the current governments current plans, in addition to an increased burden on an already well-overstretched NHS.

A Conservative government would also increase VAT to 20%, if it’s not already at 20% when they are elected, and make cuts in public services rather than increase taxes, although the National Insurance Contributions rise appears unavoidable at some point.

The first thing they’ll be considering is their own pockets, and then paying off the huge debt.)

Buy “WordPress on Crack” – Build your own WordPress plugins: Click Here!

So let’s take a look at how the 2 1/2% reduction will affect you; the British computing/geek public:

Your "cutting-edge technology" computer from PC World (UK retail store.), with a dual-core processor, 2GB generic RAM, and a 500GB hard-drive (Hardly cutting-edge!) will drop by £12.50 from £499.99 to £487.49. The 5-year warranty that they nag you into buying will only be £341.25 compared to £350. At the end of the day, then, your "yesterday’s technology at today’s prices" cloned computer will cost you a total of £829.74 compared to £849.99. (Operating system included.)

If you were to buy an equivalent purpose-built computer from Kustom Komputa with a 1TB hard-drive and 2GB branded RAM, but with only the standard 1-year warranty other than for some components with a longer manufacturer’s warranty, you’d still be paying £487.49 compared to £499.99. (Operating system included.)

Yes, I suppose that was an advert for Kustom Komputa. Of course, if you’d rather; you could always build your own:

Your new 1TB hard-drive by itself will cost you about £1.60 less. 2GB DDR2 RAM will cost around 25p less. A new chassis-fan will cost less than 5p less…

Across the board, then, the savings are so small as to be academic. Even a £16,000 Porsche will retail at £15,600: That’s £400 the government won’t be getting its hands on; it’s only £1600 rather than £2000 the greedy parliament will have to add to their coffers, but I very much doubt in itself it’ll get anyone spending any more: People will just offset the miniscule saving against inflation so far this year.

Someone’s bound to say "PC World are the bees-knees: Without PC World there wouldn’t be computers. PC World are great value-for-money. Kustom Komputa must be utter crap if they only charge that much…" (Someone actually said that to me already in essence!) Each to their own. I won’t argue with an "expert". Please email me and I’ll happily sell you a Kustomised Computer with those specifications for over £800, just to make you happy.

Do you think 2.5% is enough to get the nation spending; or is it too little too late? Leave a comment below:

I couldn’t be arsed to hypelink this article as I normally do. Let it be an exercise in the reader learning to use Google.

On October 10th 2008 I stated the following:

"In general I think that most computer users are too lax don’t take security seriously enough.

I am fairly certain that the number of machines that are still unprotected by any kind of firewall is fairly big.

I am fairly certain that the percentage of machines unprotected by any kind of anti-virus and anti-spyware software is quite high: Higher than you’d imagine.

I am fairly certain that the number of people who have anti-virus and anti-virus software installed, but whose databases have never been updated is quite colossal.

I am fairly certain that the percentage of machines that have not once taken any update to or Windows components is probably in the twenties.

I am also fairly certain that there are a number of people who’ll click on links or open attachments from unknown sources without giving it a second thought."

A new survey by the UK Government’s Get Safe Online Campaign allows me to put some actual figures to those statements:-

Overall almost half of UK internet users fail to keep their security software up-to-date.

48% do not update their anti-virus software frequently enough to ensure it remains effective.

47% do not have website authentication software to protect against phishing attacks.

23% do not have any protection against spyware.

As a result cybercrime is on the increase, especially phishing, according to the campaign.

23% of those people surveyed said that they or someone they knew was the victim of a phishing attack this year, 2008. In 2007 the figure was only 8%.

According to Tony Neate, managing director of Get Safe Online: “If internet users invest a relatively small amount of time and money in ensuring they are fully protected and up-to-date, the risk of such financial loss is almost negligible.”

‘Typical couldn’t-care-less "Der I’m a Brit so I don’t need none ov this crap" attitude. What is wrong with people? Are they really so unthinking and irresponsible in the UK? Unfortunately the figures seem to speak for themselves. I’m still getting visitors to this blog who are using Windows ME and 9x. Read this article – I wasn’t joking; these operating systems are a security risk, even if you do apply all the patches available.

"Oh who’d want to bother hacking Windows 9x? It’s outdated and Microsoft don’t have anything to lose ." Bad answer; you’re missing the point: The attacks aren’t so much virus and other malware attacks by criminal Linux zealots designed to discredit Microsoft these days. They are designed to rip off the public in any way possible, to steal money from you and me. Criminals launch malware designed to target old Microsoft operating systems still in use which aren’t patched against the latest threats. Your old relic machine running Windows ME/9x is probably being used right now as a malware relay and/or a remote server under the control of a criminal gang; and I also bet you that those criminals have any of your security details left on that computer too.

There’s no need to buy a new computer necessarily: If your machine will run Windows XP, or Ubuntu Linux even if you can’t afford a second-hand copy of XP, then all you need do is change the operating system. I’ll write an article at some point on this.

Please please please peoples; for the sake of all internet users, follow these simple rules: Yes it’ll take a little extra time; but you and everybody else will reap the rewards of doing so:-

1. Ensure that you have antivirus software installed and that it is updated daily. If you can’t or don’t want to pay for it then download Avast! Free Edition. Avast free edition includes antispyware. It updates automatically and will inform you audibly when it has done so. (Male American voice: Unchangeable.)

2. Get website authentication software. (Microsoft have this built into Internet Explorer 7 and above.)

3. Get spyware protection. Avast! free antivirus has built-in spyware protection. Some antivirus programs do not. (If your antivirus program is more than a year old it needs changing as it’s unable to detect or cope with current threats.)

I’ll be blunt here: If you can’t be bothered to stick to these simple rules then I hope you get scammed/robbed; after which you might just take some care to abide by them. If you can’t be bothered then you deserve anything and everything you get. Despite that I suggest you do the sensible thing and ensure that your online security is 100% – Before it’s too late for someone else; or more importantly before it’s too late for you.

I’m listening to izeafest online, which has started in Orlando, Florida, USA: I’m hearing, through the interruptions in the Ustream feed, about experienced bloggers making money by blogging about how much money they make. It works; and good for them – I won’t knock it – but I have problems there because I don’t make a fortune from this blog so I ask myself if I should make money by telling you how I’m not making that much money? Honest perhaps…But maybe not that impressive.

I’m looking at running a competition soon; after I’ve got a prize sorted out – It won’t be a holiday in Florida, (Unless the winner lives in Florida and they pay their own expenses ) but it’ll be something worth having. Give me a while to think on that. I’m glancing at a second-hand 1GB stick of DDR RAM with an evil smirk on my face…I mustn’t be so tight lol .

Controversial content – Hmm all my content is controversial isn’t it? Or do I echo the views of everyone else that they keep quiet about, and people just think “I agree”, and continue to stay silent?

- Yes I’m talking, in the paragraph above, about the number of comments … Oh I forgot; zero isn’t a number. OK then I’ll rephrase that: I’m talking about the lack of comments. Holy crap if the comment pool stays this dry I’ll start publishing the spam just to fill space!

Incidentally – completely off-topic – I was reading PCMech.com yesterday; (I guest-post on there sometimes…OK I have guest-posted once on there so far: I’m talking from a projected outcome. I intend to do it again; and as far as I know nobody has any objection to my doing so.) and I read Jason’s short article about the importance of using a paper-shredder in these days of identity-theft.

Being a resourceful type girl I took that a step further; and I suggest buying an industrial model that will double as a machine for making chips and french-fries.

Of course it’s a different kettle of fish if you live in the UK: The UK Government have a scheme which removes the necessity of having to shred unwanted personal documents: It’s called “Incompetence”; and guarantees that a number of UK Government officials will do things such as lose millions of personal records stored in an unencrypted format in transit on physical media, or leave a laptop with the personal details of millions of people on a train for anyone to use as they wish – Therefore removing the need for security by means of previous disclosure to all and sundry.

Enough about the afflicted; back to izeafest: Due to the time differential of 5 hours between the UK on British Summer Time (BST) and Florida on Eastern Standard Time (EST) I’m having to multitask to an impossible extent: That is to say that I’m currently typing on one computer while listening to izeafest on another, and at the same time watching a TV program I particularly wanted to see and tidying my desk to some extent. You’ll have to forgive me if I miss something somewhere.

OK lastly I was intending to say something about guest-blogging: I’ve actually had non-bloggers who have a point of view asking for a guest-slot on this blog. Unfortunately it appears these people are ideas-only people who liked the idea of appearing on Beyond but couldn’t be bothered to write the material – Which is probably the reason why they’re not themselves bloggers. FAIL.

Eventually I will ask someone to guest-post; or if you’d like to write a post I’ll eventually make it possible for you to do so and submit it to me for consideration for publication.

…And one more thing: The Large Hadron Accelerator at CERN didn’t end the world on Wednesday – Just in case you hadn’t noticed. – So much for 666 and the speculative interpretations of alleged prophecies of Nostradamus based upon uneducated guesswork with the occasional exaggeration or streak of complete BS thrown in… So maybe those sending the physicists death-threats might be able to find something else to do – Although I dread to think what.

Actually this was a bit of an ad-lib post today; but who wants to hear the latest hot articles here every day eh? Everybody’s covering those one way or another: Ok I present a few of them from the way that I see them quite often; but who wants news day in day out from whatever angle? It’s a good thing to diversify every once in a while.

That’s it for this post then: Yes I want to write more just as much as you want to hear more; but time’s not my friend right at this moment – So keep watching this space, goggle-eyed, for my next work of wonder – and don’t allow the suspense to get to you to such an extent that it becomes unbearable.

You can watch izeafest below: Until next time…

BT have messed up again! I tried to access this website via the normal ftp channel that I use to upload and download files, and the server returned an invalid address error. I checked my ftp settings on my Fasthosts account, which were correct; but still got the same result. I uninstalled and reinstalled my ftp client, FileZilla, inputted the correct settings – same result. I downloaded WS-FTP-LE , set it up, and got the same result with that too. I phoned Fasthosts who said that all BT customers had exactly the same problem since BT had introduced new  measures to combat spam and illegal downloading via P2P earlier.

What that means is that BT have introduced a new piece of equipment into the loop that looks for anything it doesn’t like and blocks it. It saw my ftp, which it passed to the server, the server responded but the BT equipment saw the response and blocked it. My ftp client didn’t get a response and assumed that there wasn’t one; hence its response.

This is all connected with this stupid illegal unworkable UK government initiative to kerb illegal downloads that I reported on earlier. http://kkomp.com/archives/629 I asked how long did they think it would take for the problem to be remedied. They said it should only take a few hours, that they were kicking and screaming at BT, and that BT had assigned some of their top technicians to the case.

Advertisment : Word Press Link Cloak: Easily disguise and protect your affiliate links to increase your revenue. Click Here!

2 Hours later I phoned BT : After following through several stages of a complicated menu I was played the message

“Welcome to BT broadband…we’re closed…” in short. “…For faults only please ring…” I did.; I endured the boring drivel about how BT record all phone calls and that if I had a problem with the internet service I could visit their website…A bit like saying

“If your car won’t start why not drive round to our garage and we’ll have it fixed in no time at all.”

“…please phone 0800…” was the message before the phone went dead: I redialed again and endured the same drivellous messages before…

“Om-put-put-ding-ding saab. Welcomming to BT. Please be to how may I help you. Can I have your name and the first line of your address please thank you?”

Yes hello Ranjeet – Here we go again. I gave my name etc – Yes I am the account holder. (Stupid question to ask: “Are you the account holder? Why not just look at the details on your screen when you bring up the account?)

“I’m having problems with using ftp over the internet and am unable to access my server at my web-host.” I continued. “BT are aware of this matter and are working to resolve it. Would you tell me how much longer you expect the matter to take until it’s resolved please.”

“You can’t access the internet?” Came the reply.

I think I used the word pillock in what I said next before I repeated myself.

“It is a problem with your server.” Said the Indian

(I’ve edited out the next few lines to make this blog fit for publication.)

“I will find out for you. Please to be holding the line. What is ftp?”

“File Transfer Protocol” I replied; amazed at the lack of knowledge. “I thought you were trained? This is a technical helpline isn’t it? – It bloody well better be as it’s the only one that’s open!”

“I will find out for you.”

The line went silent for a while and then was hung up.

“‘Cheeky f—ing bleeders!” I hit the roof.

To cut a long story short; after partly-demolishing a door that I didn’t like, I went through all that again to be told by a very gently-mannered Indian woman that nobody had a clue as nobody had been informed of it.

“Fair comment.” I thought; thanked her for her time, and rang the BT Broadband Status line, which told me that there were no problems at all with BT Broadband. I tried to connect via ftp again and got the same result. I phoned Fasthosts again, who confirmed that BT were fully informed and working on it.

- An ISP that lies; both by telephone message and by half-baked computer-illiterate representative. An ISP that neglects to inform its staff of major issues so that they can be of any help to its customers. An ISP that promises a service and ruins the experience of that service for its customers; then lies about it, and keeps everyone in the dark.

You’re wondering “Since you’ve had all this trouble with BT lately; why don’t you change ISP?”

I’d love to; but they give me material for my blog as part of their excuse for a service, so it can’t be all bad.

Advertisment:

Fire Your Computer Guy or Girl!

A computer technician spills the beans and makes available the knowledge he has charged clients hundreds in service fees for.

Computer Secrets Unleashed

To find out more

CLICK HERE

If you happen to live in the UK and happen to use Virgin Media, BT, Sky, Carphone Warehouse, Orange, or Tiscali; then at some point you may be receiving a warning letter from your ISP saying that you’ve been making illegal downloads, and threatening to suspend or possibly terminate your internet service.

These ISPs are on a three-month trial scheme, instructed by the British government, clamping down on pirating software and music, and notifying suspected repeat offenders that their actions are under scrutiny.

It’s still a mystery exactly which people these “suspected repeat offenders” could be: No doubt the ones they’ll watch are people who use P2P: So if you use LimeWire, BearShare, or any of the other P2P software for whatever reason then watch out. You don’t really imagine that they’re actually going to monitor traffic do you? That would use huge resources and cost millions – A simple P2P signature will probably activate a printer to dispatch a letter to you automatically; guilty or not.

There are currently no plans of disconnecting those who persist. The ISPs are seeking a unified code of conduct on what to do with those who continue to do so in talks with Ofcom; the UK Telecoms Regulator. One of the proposed options is to disconnect someone after sending them 3 of these warning letters. My question is: Where’s the proof? You can’t punish someone on suspicion. Just imagine if the law behaved like that: Half of the world’s population would be in jail.

Advertisement : Word Press Link Cloak: Easily disguise and protect your affiliate links to increase your revenue. Click Here!

UK business secretary John Hutton believes that this is an “intelligent approach”. The ISPs agreed to this trial following the warning from the UK government that it would impose legislation if they didn’t do something to discourage illegal filesharing. If the powers that be imagine for a second that this has any relationship whatsoever with intelligence then I think the UK Govt. should have a motion drafted against it for having none.

It is believed that six million people in the UK are involved in such activities. If they know this then why don’t they just issue six million warnings straight away? It would be so much easier and consume far less resources. Also I’m just wondering: What if you happen to be an innocent party who’s never done an illegal download in their life; and you get one of these letters – Then what? Do you phone the ISP and argue your case? I doubt they’ll even listen: You’re guilty because a computer decided that you should be sent a letter – End of story. No doubt after letter 1 you’ll be put on a “watch list”, and a computer will have no hesitation in deciding that you should receive letter No.2. Use your imagination from this point onwards.

XoftSpySE

Anti-Spyware 

§ Complete PC  scanning, including running processes, registry entries, files and folders

§ Detects and removes: adware, spyware, pop-Up generators, keyloggers, trojans, hijackers, and malware

§ One of the largest spyware definition databases in the industry

§ Automatic definition and feature updates

§ Fast, powerful, and easy to use

§ Comprehensive customer technical support

§ Protects against identity and credit card theft  

To discover more and get a FREE scan Click Here!  

Addendum 01.08.08

It appears that something positive is happening about this matter, and that once again the fascist UK goverment has introduced an unworkable proposal that won’t stand up to European Law.

For more on this subject go here.

It won’t be long before sophisticated advanced computers are scrutinising your every move online – Just you wait and see if I’m not right.

As for the Carphone Warehouse; well it’s hardly “Your phone your way” is it?

More like “our service, our rules”.