Dwindling Economy Hits US Trade Shows
*See also this BBC report. - But it’s not Macworld alone that’s been hit: This week’s CES in Vegas is showing a decline in exhibitors this year, with figures down by 10% on last year: Some exhibitors even pulling out at the last minute, while others are making cutbacks in their showing. Personally I take the David Risley line on this, and I think that, if anything, companies should be increasing their advertising budgets rather than cutting them in an economic downturn. - Each to their own though: Some will survive, some will fall by the wayside regardless.
Analysts are now questioning the viability of trade-shows in the light of today’s climate: On the other side of the coin; Jason Oxman, senior vice president at the Consumer Electronics Association, disagrees: "Trade shows take on renewed importance in a down economy. Every major consumer electronics manufacturer, buyer, installer and retailer is there. It’s the most efficient travel saver imaginable." Will this type of opinion retain validity in the light of experience though? Could we see a considerable cutting-back of trade shows? Will we see many going the way of Macworld in the light of experience and reality? It’s certainly a possibility. Time will tell.
|
Why Microsoft Must Launch Windows 7 in 2009
|
When Microsoft launched Vista it was to fanfares and promises of a new age of excellence dawning: The problem was that they missed the boat by a mile and landed in dangerous waters. There were problems with the final beta release in 2006 which they attempted to address in the hope of a pre-2007 launch date: As the end of 2006 loomed; however, Microsoft were still desperately struggling. By the time everything was supposedly sorted the holiday season was over Unperturbed by this setback; Microsoft went ahead with the launch in the early part of 2007; but in their last-minute rush had overlooked many major issues which hadn’t been properly patched or remedied in the final retail release. It wasn’t until 2008 when Service Pack 1 was launched in its own final retail release that these bugs were patched and remedied to a reasonable extent; yet despite this the new operating system was still buggier and slower than its predecessor; Windows XP. People were starting to describe Vista as the second ME by this point; and despite Microsoft’s determination to press ahead - withdrawing sales of XP in June 2008 by the major system builders - the Microsoft following revolted by using the downgrade facility made available wit6h Windows Vista Business and Ultimate to revert their Vista installations back to XP. Still others abandoned the Microsoft camp altogether and defected to Linux or Mac OS*. All-in-all the entire shenanigan was a complete embarrassment for M$; who still have the egg on their face to this day. And today, with an entirely new openness and more user-interactive approach to development from Microsoft; Windows 7 looms on the horizon. The softies originally set a release strategy for 1H 2010 for the new operating system; however Bill Gates let slip on numerous occasions, hints of a possible 2009 release schedule. What would happen if M$ were to wait until 2010 to release 7?. They’d miss the holiday season again; and with their current reputation in tatters thanks to their late production of the best promotion campaign for XP ever; namely Vista, Microsoft need to get as many copies out as fast as they can immediately, following RTM of the final retail release; or those people expecting another damp squib - Which will I expect be a sizable percentage of those in the firing line of the new release - will prefer to either stick to their new Apple computer purchased at Christmas or in the January sales; or stick to their newly-downloaded Linux distro and not bother paying for another possible disaster of an operating system. Although Windows 7 is currently billed by the supergeeks as ‘Vista that works with a few extras added’, it is surely going to come under close scrutiny from the online geek community; particularly the bloggers. If it’s not up to scratch I see people such as Michael Arrington; and possibly even the likes of tech bloggers such as David Risley; both of whom are converts from Windows to Mac, dissecting and analysing every last wrinkle and bug that Microsoft didn’t remove prior to release. In all honesty I sincerely believe that Windows 7 will be make or break for M$; and following the recent fiascos it’ll not just have to be good but it’ll have to be particularly good in order to convince the critics that Microsoft still have the wind in their sails to keep the profit in their sales. To read more on the current latest news on Windows 7; see what What do you think: Has Vista doomed Microsoft to an uncertain future dependant upon the success or flop of Windows 7; or will the current downturn in the software giant’s fortunes be just a blip in an otherwise gently-upward trace of success? Please do leave a comment. |
Comments
"Unreliable Platform"
"Dave Winer, 53, pioneered the development of weblogs, syndication (RSS), podcasting, outlining, and web content management software; former contributing editor at Wired Magazine, research fellow at Harvard Law School, entrepreneur, and investor in web media companies. A native New Yorker, he received a Master’s in Computer Science from the University of Wisconsin, a Bachelor’s in Mathematics from Tulane University and currently lives in Berkeley, California."http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/09/13/whyIphoneIsAnUreliablePlat.html I think, on that evidence, it would be fair to assume that he knows what he’s talking about: I’m sure you’d agree - So when Dave Winer says that the iPhone is an unreliable platform it should make some people pop their head up from their comfort zone and take note. Wakey-wakey! What he didn’t say; and I stress this now so as his words aren’t taken out of context, is that the iPhone software provided by Apple is buggy and unfit for purpose. I’ve not read any complaints about iPhone 2.1 yet; but then again I didn’t read that many about 2.0; even though I knew for a fact from insider information that it was so: The Apple faithful remain tight-lipped about any of Apple’s failings; though one can read between the lines and derive their true feelings by inference rather than by direct speech:
For instance; David Risley posted an article on his blog about his initial impressions of the iPhone while posting to said blog using the iPhone WordPress App. After he made an obvious comment about the fact that it works, he followed it with two negative criticisms; a complimentary remark in the following paragraph to diffuse his last two points; saying that it’s "…pretty cool that I can even do it at all", followed by "End of post because typing on this thing is still a bit slow. So an iPhone is "Pretty cool because [it works - Because it doesn't 'not work']"? Hmm. An interesting definition of ‘pretty cool’ there David. - So; my television clapped out after over 30 years this week: The screen is blue; nothing else; just blue. (’ironic, myself being a Wintard, that my TV dies with a BSOD!) But it works nevertheless: It still produces sound; and there’s still something on the screen: It’s a "pretty cool" TV then? (I am aware that there is a track fault on the PCB in the colour synchronisation separation circuitry; but the dear old set is so old I’m not going to bother fixing it: I’ve already got another one.) My comment on David’s post was: "So overall you’re saying that it’s a load of utterly unusable crap that is non-user-friendly, slow, and poorly designed; but it’s really cool because it’s an Apple iPhone. Wow!" I’m not "anti-iPhone" or "anti-Apple" despite appearances: "Anti" is too strong a description: I see it all for what it is, and what it is; or at least was, is no more than a botched rushed attempt from Jobsweh at making a fortune. By combining this with employing a strategy copied almost directly from the previous actions of Microsoft; the gamble paid off, and Apple landed in clover and Jobsweh made his massive profits. Fair play to him. Back to Dave Winer; who is saying that developing an iPhone App isn’t worth the hassle; because when all’s said and done; apple might reject it after all the work and aggravation has been carried out. Why would Apple reject it? Not necessarily simply because of an unseen bug that might make it detrimental to people’s iPhone hardware; but because it competes with existing Apps; as in the case of Podcaster yesterday, (13th September 2008.) where Podcaster was rejected because it competed with iTunes. It’s as if Apple are saying: "We’re the best, and we alone make the best software for our own hardware. Anything that competes with or that appears to be better than anything that we build will be immediately silenced and we’ll just conveniently forget that it ever existed - Because you honestly can’t better Apple; so don’t even try." Or put another way: "I am the great Jobsweh; god of all things Apple, and there are no gods, no programmers, no designers, better than me. I am the beginning and the end. I was there before computers existed and I shall be there after they have ceased to exist…" …Er hang on Steve; aren’t you forgetting something? You’re mortal yes? I think I’ll end here with the last words of Dave Winer in his article: "…the Internet is the platform without a platform vendor. That’s the most powerful kind of platform there is because it is the least regulated." Thank the gods (Excluding Jobsweh.) for Web 2.0. See also: |
Apple Fanboys Join the Moaners
|
We’ve heard moans twice from Apple Fanboi Michael Arrington; but we want to be convinced that it’s not just one voice in the darkness.Well here it is: The post you never expected to see from one of the new Apple fanboys:- |
||
|
“Apple Showing Warning Signs” “As many of my readers know, I have converted pretty much everything to Apple products. I am now a Mac user and recently I switched to the Iphone. As of a few days ago, even my keyboard is built by Apple. I am a fan of the company and their products, but I am seeing big red flares that are showing signs of trouble on the horizon.” (I think that’s meant to be iPhone; but ‘easy typo either way.) -So David says; and I quote “I am a fan of the company and their products“. Fair enough: Each to their own. He continues:- |
||
“Why I Like Apple““It continues to be funny when I witness the emotional reaction Apple can get out of people. A lot of non-Apple geeks are quick to dismiss me as a “fanboy” because I like Apple. Such a reaction is really asinine and, ironically, often comes from people who would buy Apple if not for monetary reasons…” Help me Wikipedia:“By 1990 the term was being used in popular music and science fiction circles, and as electronic entertainment gained popularity, the term became increasingly applied to computers and video game consoles - with people often developing an obsessive loyalty towards one platform or brand.” “Current subjects of such obsessive loyalty include areas of: TV shows; movies; music; anime; comic books; cars; video game consoles, video games and MMORPGs; and computer operating systems, hardware and software—and more recently politics.” “”Fanboy” was added to the Merriam-Webster Collegiate Dictionary in 2008.“ |
||
|
||
“…But, There Are Warning Signs”“While I have admired the user-centric design of Apple products, the company has been showing some signs of losing touch. Some examples:
|
||
|
Fail Better |
||
|
“What I’m sensing is a bunch of Apple users who really want to continue liking Apple, but are having to find ways to explain the parade of bonehead moves and buggy products coming from the company.” That last sentance was very well written and extremely spot-on-target: Those people are called “Apple fanboys/girls”. Of course, not being a fanboy himself - and any suggestion that he might actually be a fanboy being “really asinine“; David doesn’t fit anywhere near into that category: “In all fairness, most computer companies release crappy stuff. I guess Apple is held to a higher standard because of their marketing and the loyal following that they have. Perhaps Apple is just showing us one thing: they’re a computer company just like any other computer company.” Of course; that’s not actually anything like “ways to explain the parade of bonehead moves and buggy products coming from the company.” : It’s just an excuse for darling Apple’s incompetence - ‘All companies cock-up from time to time: Apple are no different; in fact they’re much better at cocking up than any other company.’ Exactly; just one of the many things they do better than anyone else, isn’t it?
|
||
|
You read it first here; unless you read it first there: Apple cocked up - As admitted under a veil by an Apple…non-fanboy himself. My analysis? Apple have lost it: I foresee a lot of their market-sector gains dwindling slowly back to much how they were. I see the crown falling from Jobsweh’s head. As a Microsoft fan I don’t see any immediate advantage to Microsoft. I would say that Linux will continue to make small gains from both M$ and Apple, at least until Windows 7 is released. Do I see Linux reaching 10% market-sector impact? It’s possible but unlikely in my estimation. I won’t rule it out altogether, but Linux had its day; in fact around 3650+ of them. Ubuntu have made inroads in a sense; but the various distros are still proving difficult to give away; even in the light of Microsoft’s shot in its own foot with Vista.
|
||
?
|
Shazza Does Gnomedex - From the UK
|
I caught David Risley online via the feed at the Gnomedex pre-conference bash and tried to get an interview of sorts. The chat was so hectic that this was quite obviously impossible and I was in the wrong place at the wrong time. I did manage to get about 3 lines through though, as you’ll see toward the end of this video clip recorded from the online stream: Technology is a fantastic thing; and all the world’s population now has the opportunity (Most have the ability.) to communicate over large distances via the internet to unite the entire globe.
After Dave Risley followed Sarah Lacy, who seemed to do her own show jointly along with virtually everyone else present: Sarah turned out to be an excellent chat-show co-host, and the presentation was most enjoyable and entertaining. The chatroom crowd interacted with the presenters and guests, resulting in a quite spectacular interactive production which, other than for the quality of the Ustream feed, was worthy of a television performance. Towards the end of the long evening, as the alcohol flowed freely, one of the guests became aggressive and attempted to disrupt the show with a verbal attack on Sarah, her other current guests, and her co-presenter(s). This was handled extremely professionally, courteously, and graciously, by Sarah herself and a couple of the guests; one in particular whose name I forget (’May have been Eric Rice?) as it was about 4AM BST and I had my eyelids propped open with matchsticks. Another small downer was the absence from the show of Tara Hunt, aka @missrogue, who was requested to guest by a large number of the chatroom, including myself; and who I feel could have made a valuable extra contribution had anyone been able to locate her. Quite obviously Tara has an extremely busy schedule: This most articulate lady leads a jet-set life filled with great achievements, and parties hard in any spare time she gets: Quite a live-wire! Everything suddenly scaled down in a matter of minutes, and the party was completely over and empty by 6AM BST. The main host, Chris Pirillo, did make a short appearance on the feed towards the end of the night; after his parents had been on and had been interviewed by the chatroom crowd about his young days and his personal life. During this time I was writing the first draft of my last blog entry in addition to watching the feed. I hope my multitasking didn’t make me miss too much of the proceedings. All in all it was a thoroughly dynamic event. Apologies for having missed out anybody: There were three birthday people that night; one of whom was Kathy, the others…I think I remember it was Sarah Lacy’s too: Belated Happy Birthday wishes to all anyway. The rest of Gnomedex is currently running for real. You can pick up the live Ustream feed at http://chris.pirillo.com/live/
|
Fire Your Computer Technician!A computer technician spills the beans and makes available the knowledge he has charged clients hundreds in service fees for. |
Twitter: War On The iPhone - Military Logs
Starring:Sharron (Me)
|
|
Advertisment : No targeted advertising available: So I’ll use this one: |
Comments
Politico-geek
| An intellectual geek, self-confessed nerd, soon-to-be online-marketing-success-story, professional blogger and family man; David Risley could quite easily be described as Tampa’s “Mr Tech”.
“David Risley is an internet entrepreneur and professional technology blogger. With about 10 years of experience in this field, David has a solid and practical understanding of the web and what works. He is the founder and President of PC Media, Inc., a Tampa-Bay based company active in internet media publishing. |
||
|
||
| Recently, in an entry posted 15th July 2008 to be exact, he posted what appears to be a one-off foray into politics. http://www.davidrisley.com/2008/07/15/bloggers-for-obama-lemmings-for-something-shiny/
Using his excellent flowingly-articulate writing-style he managed to keep the coverage to as level a playing-field as possible, showing very little if any of his personal political preference, yet still succeeding in giving the mass-ranks of pro-Obama bloggers a flea in the ear for their one-sided biased coverage of Barack Obama’s political campaign.
Did David really keep the playing field level though, and did he, a professional tech blogger, inadvertently take a step into territory where the nerd-angels fear to tread? His second paragraph starts off:”We’re in the election season and that means we’re seeing lots of politics online. Since I follow social media, I can clearly [tell] which of the candidates seems to be the favorite of the blogosphere: Barack Obama.” |
||
| OK so much for proof-reading; but ignoring an honest accidental mistake in leaving a single word out; does the above indicate any political preference or bias? It could be loosely construed if this passage is taken by itself ignoring the rest of the article that by his mention only of Obama he sets a biased tone for the underlying theme.
However in reality we have to take the post as a whole and analyse the bigger picture.Further down he shows a more balanced approach when inculcating both candidates. : He states:”I have no doubt Barack Obama is a good man. I have no reason not to like him. But, when I see bloggers so blindly vouch for the guy, and so eagerly blame Bush for anything and everything and find every possible fault in John McCain…” Is this really balanced though, or does it have a supportive slant for McCain? By itself perhaps; although once again we must look at the bigger picture. Let’s do just that from a statistical point of view:- Mentioning of Candidates Obama: 7 mentions McCain: 1 mention Can any conclusion be drawn from this? I wouldn’t say so despite the repeated mentions of Obama: After all; that is part of the overall theme: Bloggers’ documentation of Obama’s campaign in exclusion of and to the detriment of, McCain’s.
|
||
|
||
| Overall it appears that David Risley has done an extremely good job of maintaining a viewpoint of neutrality despite his political convictions while covering this topic: An achievement which is rather commendable.What are David Risley’s political convictions? I have no idea honestly; and even if I did know this, the fact that I revealed them in this article of mine would lead to a distortedly-biased view of his words by the readers.
He concludes with the words:”I’m not a political blogger and I’m not going to start. I follow tech, not politics. But, as a professional blogger who wants to see blogging recognized as the profession it is, I do not want to see bloggers as a whole turn into blind lapdogs for the latest shiny political figure…”
- All-in-all a quick dip into the edges of the political quagmire out of partial-necessity using the correct safety-harness and coming out completely unscathed. This demonstrates resilience and the mark of a talented writer: There aren’t a lot of bloggers out there that could even do this; let alone in such a manner. If I were running a “Blogger of the Month Award” then I feel that this post would be a very strong front runner at this time, and could easily end up winning first prize. |



